Ahead of the #Disinfo2026 conference in Vilnius, Lithuania, discussions have emerged concerning the event’s agenda, which includes an examination of whether the United States could be considered a source of foreign information manipulation and interference. This conference, scheduled for October 7 and 8, aims to bring together key stakeholders, including researchers, journalists, technology experts, and policymakers, to explore strategies for combating disinformation.
The conference has sparked controversy, leading to the withdrawal of official support from Lithuania, Canada, and the European Union. The retraction of support came after US officials engaged with these governments regarding their involvement in the event. Internal US documents reportedly indicated that officials were pleased with Lithuania’s decision to reduce its participation. Lithuania stated that certain parts of the conference program did not align with its official stance.
Canada also revised its participation, citing changes to the framing of several panel discussions as the reason. However, Canadian representatives continued to attend the event in a non-official capacity. Similarly, the EU withdrew its official backing, noting that some discussions did not align with its positions. Despite this, the EU continues to provide financial support for the conference.
The dispute primarily revolves around a panel that questions the United States’ role as a potential threat in terms of foreign information manipulation and interference. This has sparked a broader debate about the balance between countering disinformation and permitting open discussions regarding government actions. The tension underscores differing perspectives among Western governments on defining and responding to foreign information threats.
In contrast to the withdrawals, France has maintained its support for the conference, emphasizing the importance of engaging with civil society in shaping European policies on disinformation. This situation highlights the ongoing challenges and differing approaches among Western allies in addressing and understanding the complexities of disinformation in the digital age.
